It’s a Hollywood stereotype: Men prefer to partner up with
feminine-looking women, and women favor masculine men. But even when you allow
for same-gender couples and variations in personal preference, plenty of
research suggests that the proposition is generally true.
“It’s been replicated many times across different cultures,” says Isabel Scott, a psychologist at Brunel University in Uxbridge, on the outskirts of London. “So people tend to assume it’s universal.”
A new study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences challenges that thinking, however.
“It’s been replicated many times across different cultures,” says Isabel Scott, a psychologist at Brunel University in Uxbridge, on the outskirts of London. “So people tend to assume it’s universal.”
A new study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences challenges that thinking, however.
Historically, human studies have shown that women with more feminine
faces tend to have higher estrogen levels, which are in turn associated with
reproductive health. In men, the argument is that masculine-looking faces are
associated with stronger immune systems—always a good thing in a mate,
especially if that trait is passed on to the kids. Masculine appearance may
also a sign of a dominant and aggressive personality, but our distant female
ancestors might plausibly have gravitated toward these men anyway, for the sake
of their children’s health.
These theories
fall under the rubric of evolutionary psychology—the idea that many of our
fundamental behaviors have evolved, just as our bodies did, to maximize
reproductive success. But as in many cases with evolutionary psychology, it’s
easier to come up with a plausible explanation than to demonstrate that it’s
correct. In this case, says Scott, “the assumptions people were making weren't crazy. They just weren't fully tested.”
To correct
that, Scott and the 21 colleagues who put together the new study used computer
simulations to merge photos of men’s and women’s faces into composite,
“average” faces of five different ethnicities. Then they twirled some virtual
dials to make more and less masculine-looking male faces and more or less
feminine female versions. (“More masculine” in this case means that they
calculated the specific differences between the average man’s face and the
average woman’s for each ethnicity, then exaggerated the differences. “Less
masculine” means they minimized the differences. Same goes, in reverse, for the
women’s faces.)
Then they
showed the images to city-dwellers in several countries and also to rural
populations in Malaysia, Fiji, Ecuador, Central America, Central Asia and
more—a total of 962 subjects. “We asked, ‘What face is the most attractive’ and
‘What face is the most aggressive looking,'” says Scott.
The answers
from urban subjects more or less confirmed the scientists’ expectations, but
the others were all over the place. “This came as a big surprise to us,” Scott
says. “In South America,” for example, “women preferred feminine-looking men.
It was quite unexpected.”
If these
preferences had an evolutionary basis, you’d expect them to be strongest in
societies most similar to the ones early humans lived in. “These are clearly
modern preferences, though,” Scott says, which raises the question of why they
arose.
One idea,
which she calls “extremely speculative at this point,” is that when you pack lots
of people together, as you do in a city, stereotyping of facial characteristics
might be a way of making snap judgements. “In urban settings,” she says, “you
encounter far more strangers, so you have a stronger motive to figure out their
personalities on zero acquaintance.”
-Culled From
TIME
No comments:
Post a Comment